Which would reflect extremely badly on the club. Employing someone for doing something, then sacking him when he does what’s he’s been employed for...
I’m sure he’d much rather fail on his own terms than compromise to try and please others and fail that way instead
- Good article - Famous 21/01, 07:52
- Good article - Walter 21/01, 12:36
- Good article - Famous 21/01, 13:05
- Good article - Walter 21/01, 13:09
- Good article - Famous 21/01, 13:21
- Good article - OSGOODWASGOOD 21/01, 14:57
- Good article - Famous 21/01, 15:46
- Good article - Walter 21/01, 14:24
- Good article - Famous 21/01, 14:31
- Good article - OSGOODWASGOOD 21/01, 14:57
- Good article - Famous 21/01, 13:21
- Good article - Walter 21/01, 13:09
- Good article - Famous 21/01, 13:05
- Good article - Brown_Celery 21/01, 09:43
- Good article - nstand 21/01, 08:49
- Good article - Famous 21/01, 09:31
- Good article - upthechels 21/01, 09:23
- Good article - OSGOODWASGOOD 21/01, 08:15
- Good article - Famous 21/01, 08:23
- Good article - nstand 21/01, 08:52
- Good article - Famous 21/01, 09:27
- Good article - upthechels 21/01, 08:33
- Good article - Famous 21/01, 08:47
- Good article - OSGOODWASGOOD 21/01, 08:32
- Good article - Famous 21/01, 08:48
- Good article - OSGOODWASGOOD 21/01, 09:24
- Good article - Famous 21/01, 09:32
- Good article - shed69 22/01, 21:16
- Good article - Brown_Celery 21/01, 09:45
- Good article - OSGOODWASGOOD 21/01, 09:45
- Good article - Famous 21/01, 09:32
- Good article - OSGOODWASGOOD 21/01, 09:24
- Good article - Famous 21/01, 08:48
- Good article - nstand 21/01, 08:52
- Good article - Famous 21/01, 08:23
- Good article - Walter 21/01, 12:36